Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Erlandson's avatar

It is always sad to me when someone can see the obvious superiority of Christian art, but fails to understand (or believe) the reason behind it. Myself, I was pretty much converted to Anglicanism by the beauty of a single sentence in the English language:

WHEREFORE O Lord and heavenly Father, according to the institution of thy dearly beloved Son our Saviour Jesus Christ, we, thy humble servants, do celebrate and make here before thy Divine Majesty, with these thy holy gifts, which we now offer unto thee, the memorial thy Son hath commanded us to make; having in remembrance his blessed passion and precious death, his mighty resurrection and glorious ascension; rendering unto thee most hearty thanks for the innumerable benefits procured unto us by the same.

Expand full comment
Gordzilla's avatar

I have two thoughts after reading this:

1.) Maybe there's a reason Jesus chose his disciples primarily from people who were not the learned class. In fact, thinking of 1 Corinthians 1: 19-21, it seems to offer a reason.

2.) The primary problem with the letter writer's outlook is found in this sentence: "It doesn’t seem to me the way an omnipotent deity should operate." It reminds me of the following passage from C.S. Lewis's "Mere Christianity":

"Reality, in fact, is usually something you could not have guessed. That is one of the reasons I believe Christianity. It is a religion that you could not have guessed. If it offered us just the kind of universe we had always expected, I should feel we were making it up. But, in fact, it is not the sort of thing anyone would have made up. It has just that queer twist about it that real things have. So let us leave behind all thee boys’ philosophies – – these over simple answers. The problem is not simple and the answer is not going to be simple either."

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts